![]() The new interface has polarised opinion somewhat amongst Cubaserati, but personally I love the look and feel of it. Well, after using it solidly for a few weeks now, I can safely say that it doesn’t disappoint. So is the second paid update in under a year worth shelling out for? Now, less than nine months after causing contoversy with their first ever paid point update, Steinberg have unleashed Cubase 7 on an unsuspecting public, and what’s more are charging £120 for the privilege of upgrading from 6.5. It was like meeting up with an old friend to find that they’d taken up bodybuilding, learnt five new languages and had four facelifts since you saw them last. ![]() ![]() Until March 2012, when I was asked to review Cubase 6.5 for Computer Music magazine. So Cubase was ditched as soon as I could get my hands on ProTools, and I haven’t used Cubase again since. But then hard disk recording was born, and to my dismay the £5000 Mac system I bought to run Cubase Audio XT, the first audio capable version of Cubase, just wasn’t up to the task. It was my MIDI sequencer of choice back when we were all using Atari 1040ST’s to program tunes, syncing up to analogue tape machines via SMPTE code when any audio tomfoolery was required. I’ve always had a soft spot for Steinberg’s Cubase.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |